Apr 19, 2021
As you may know, we have supported a request to the CRA to extend the April 30 deadline to June 15. But if the deadline is NOT extended, here are some practical tips to reduce the burden of a COVID tax season.
“A loss determination cannot be used to claim losses not shown on the original tax return.”
When a taxpayer files a tax return with a loss, the loss is subject to audit until such time as a loss determination is made. For example, if a loss determination is made in 2001, the statute-barredperiod of three years and the objection period of 90 days starts at that time. If a loss determination was never made for a year in which there was a loss, it is possible that the loss could be reviewed at any time as there is no statute-barred period. The issue of when a loss determination can be made was dealt with in the case of Armstrong(2006 DTC 6310).
The taxpayer filed his 1993 tax return without reflecting the non-capital loss from a rental property.The taxpayer made objections and appeals and went to Tax Court for the 1993 taxation year regarding other issues, not the losses. Once the 1993 year was settled, the taxpayer asked for a loss determination for 1993 in the hope of carrying back the loss to 1991. The taxpayer also tried to file an amended 1993 tax return reflecting the loss and the loss carryback to 1991. The CRA and Tax Court rejected the taxpayer’s ability to open up the 1993 year by asking for a loss determination. Instead, theFederal Court of Appeal determined that a taxpayer must report a loss in its return of income in order to ask for the loss determination under subsection 152(1.1). A taxpayer cannot use a loss determination as a means to correcting deductions that were not taken in the proper year.
Notwithstanding the above, subsection 152(4.2) gives the Minister “unfettered discretion” toreassess an individual after the expiration of the normal reassessment period for a year if the individual requests the reassessments to reduce tax payable. The counsel for the CRA conceded that the taxpayer had made a request. The Minister had declined to deal with that request until all litigation was concluded. It was the Federal Court’s understanding that the request would be dealt with after the appeals that were being heard by the Federal Court of Appeal. In other words, the CRA wanted a judicial decision as to whether or not technically the taxpayer could open up the 1993 and 1991 year by asking for a loss determination. Once it was determined that he could not do this, the CRA used its discretion to do exactly the same thing.
TAX TIP OF THE WEEK is provided as a free service to clients and friends of the Tax Specialist Group member firms. The Tax Specialist Group is a national affiliation of firms who specialize in providing tax consulting services to other professionals, businesses and high net worth individuals on Canadian and international tax matters and tax disputes.
The material provided in Tax Tip of the Week is believed to be accurate and reliable as of the date it is written. Tax laws are complex and are subject to frequent change. Professional advice should always be sought before implementing any tax planning arrangements. Neither the Tax Specialist Group nor any member firm can accept any liability for the tax consequences that may result from acting based on the contents hereof.
TAX TIP is provided as a free service to clients and friends of Cadesky Tax.
The material provided in Tax Tip is believed to be accurate and reliable as of the date of posting. Tax laws are complex and are subject to frequent change. Professional advice should always be sought before implementing any tax planning arrangements. Cadesky Tax cannot accept any liability for the tax consequences that may result from acting based on the contents hereof.