A New Playing Field for Waiver of Interest and Penalty
Volume No. 11-10
“The ten-year rule refers to the years during which the interest accrued..”
The Federal Court of Appeal issued a landmark decision on June 2, 2011, changing the landscape for applications for waiver of interest and penalty.
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has a policy of “Taxpayer Relief” (formerly called “Fairness”), under which it may waive interest and penalty in extraordinary circumstances, such as where a taxpayer was affected by illness, where the CRA provided wrong information, where there have been unreasonable delays on the CRA’s part, and various other circumstances. This waiver is authorized under subsection 220(3.1) of the Income Tax Act.
In 2004, subsection 220(3.1) was changed to prohibit the CRA from providing such interest waiver unless application for relief was made to the CRA within ten years after the end of the taxation year.
The interpretation of this rule was uncertain. The CRA and some early court decisions said that the “taxation year” was the original year in which the debt arose. The contrary view, put forward for many years by the TSG’s David Sherman in his Practitioner’s Income Tax Act, was that it referred to the years during which the interest accrued.
To take a simple example: suppose you invested in a tax shelter in 2000, and the CRA reassessed you in 2002 to deny the shelter benefits. After many delays on the CRA’s part, you lose an appeal in the Courts in 2011. Assume the delays were sufficient to qualify for Taxpayer Relief interest waiver.
The CRA would say that if you didn’t apply for interest waiver by the end of 2010, they had no legal authority to waive the interest that accrued on your 2000 taxation year from 2001 on, even though you would otherwise qualify for relief.
The Federal Court of Appeal has now ruled otherwise. In Bozzer v. The Queen, 2011 FCA 186, the Court of Appeal ruled that the ten-year rule refers to the years during which the interest accrued. Thus, in this example, if you apply for relief during 2011, the CRA would have authority to waive all of the interest that accrued from 2001 on. (Of course, you still have to qualify under the CRA’s Taxpayer Relief guidelines.)
The CRA could still apply for leave to appeal the Bozzer decision to the Supreme Court of Canada, but this is not expected to happen, as it is unlikely that the Supreme Court would be willing to hear the case.
TAX TIP OF THE WEEK is provided as a free service to clients and friends of the Tax Specialist Group member firms. The Tax Specialist Group is a national affiliation of firms who specialize in providing tax consulting services to other professionals, businesses and high net worth individuals on Canadian and international tax matters and tax disputes.
The material provided in Tax Tip of the Week is believed to be accurate and reliable as of the date it is written. Tax laws are complex and are subject to frequent change. Professional advice should always be sought before implementing any tax planning arrangements. Neither the Tax Specialist Group nor any member firm can accept any liability for the tax consequences that may result from acting based on the contents hereof.
TAX TIP is provided as a free service to clients and friends of Cadesky Tax.
The material provided in Tax Tip is believed to be accurate and reliable as of the date of posting. Tax laws are complex and are subject to frequent change. Professional advice should always be sought before implementing any tax planning arrangements. Cadesky Tax cannot accept any liability for the tax consequences that may result from acting based on the contents hereof.
Cadesky Tax Firm Brochure
Experience. Excellence. Delivered.
Subscribe to the Cadesky Tax Newsletter
Free of charge and delivered straight to your inbox.